Trust did not terminate under ‘merger doctrine’ since intent of settler was for
trust to continue until final distribution of trust property occurred.
A California Court
of Appeal affirmed the lower court’s decision in ROBERT WEINBERGER v. JAMES G. MORRIS et al.
The trial court found that the merger doctrine did not apply in this case and that the
Defendant had distributed the real property as the rightful trustee of the Plaintiff’s
mother’s Trust. The appellate court agreed.
On October 12, 1996 Sue Weinberger
(Mrs. Weinberger) executed a declaration of trust, which created the “Sue Weinberger
Trust”. On the same day, she executed a quitclaim deed which transferred her home on
Atoll Avenue into the Trust. The Trust provided that Mrs. Weinberger was the initial trustee
and Sheila Weinberger (her daughter) was successor trustee, followed by Lee Davis (Sheila’s
fiancee). The Trust also provided that after Mrs. Weinberger’s death, the trustee was to
“pay all its expenses, and that all trust assets, save the personal effects which [Mrs.]
Weinberger requested distributed in separate written instructions, were to go to
Sheila.” It also provided that if Sheila died prior to receiving and distributing
everything in the trust, the undistributed principal and income would go to Davis. Another
part of the Trust provided that Mrs. Weinberger’s son Robert was intentionally omitted from
Mrs. Weinberger died in May 1997; Sheila recorded an Affidavit Death of
Trustee/Trustor the following December. Sheila never transferred the Atoll Avenue property out
of the Trust and to herself as the beneficiary. Sheila died in September 2002. In
November 2005, Davis recorded an Affidavit Death of Trustee, which disclosed that Sheila, a
successor trustee of the Trust, had died. At the same time, Davis executed a quitclaim deed
that transferred the Atoll Avenue property out of the Trust and to himself, which was recorded in
In June 2006, Robert Weinberger filed this suit (Morris is Davis’
attorney), claiming that he was the rightful owner of the Atoll Avenue property because the Trust
only named Davis as a “contingent beneficiary” which would only allow the property to
pass to him in the event that Sheila died before her mother. Robert also alleged that the
property passed to Sheila when her mother died, and then when Sheila died, the property passed to
Robert because he was her heir.
In February 2009, the trial court entered its decision,
which named Lee Davis as the beneficiary of the Trust. In April 2009, Robert filed an
The trial court decided that Robert’s argument implicates the
“merger doctrine” which in summary states:
sole trustee of a trust and the sole beneficiary of the trust become one-and-the-same person, the
duties of the person, in his or her role as trustee, and the interests of the person, in his or her
role as beneficiary, ‘merge,’ meaning that the trust terminates as a matter of law, and
the trust’s assets irrevocably vest in the beneficiary”
The trial court also found
that this doctrine did not apply. They found that the Sue Weinberger Trust “continued
until there was a final distribution of the assets of the Trust.” Because the real
property remained in the Trust when Sheila died, Lee Davis rightly distributed it to himself, acting
as the trustee of the Trust. The appellate court agreed with this decision, and further
contended that “this reading is also consistent with the fundamental purpose of the Trust,
which expressly provides that Mrs. Weinberger had ‘intentionally omitted to provide for her
Quotes and information gathered from The Daily Recorder,
Vol. 103, No. 188, September 29, 2010 Daily Appellate Report.
Disclaimer: The information provided on Lawyers.com is not legal advice, Lawyers.com is not a lawyer referral service, and no attorney-client or confidential relationship is or should be formed by use of the site. The attorney listings on Lawyers.com are paid attorney advertisements and do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by Lawyers.com or any approved or authorized lawyer referral service. Your access of/to and use of this site is subject to additional Terms and Conditions.
Martindale-Hubbell and martindale.com are registered trademarks; AV, BV, AV Preeminent and BV Distinguished are registered certification marks; Lawyers.com and the Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rated Icon are service marks; and Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings are trademarks of Internet Brands, Inc., used under license. Other products and services may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies.