Many states have enacted environmental statutes that are different from the provisions of federal statutes. If the federal statutes provide more extensive protection of the environment, usually the provisions of state statutes are preempted by the federal legislation, requiring the more stringent federal standards to be applied in the state.
Generally, however, states may provide a level of environmental protection more stringent than that provided by federal law. In those states, the more stringent state statutes must be followed unless it is determined that the federal enactment was intended to preempt more stringent state laws.
For example, California has a number of stringent environmental laws, including:
As another example, New Jersey has statutes restricting development in wetlands that are more stringent than federal law.
Many federal environmental statutes provide for the enforcement of their provisions by the states. In some cases, the failure of state governments to properly implement federal environmental laws may result in the imposition of sanctions, such as withdrawal of federal highway funding.
| Environmental Message Board for more help |
a statutory lien on property for taxes due giving the taxing authority a security interest in the property
More Legal News