Hiring
Under federal law, an employer doesn't have to hire, or promote, the most qualified applicant. But the employer cannot base decisions on personal characteristics that are not job-related. These characteristics often include:
An interviewer isn't allowed to ask questions relating to these characteristics. Interview questions that aren't allowed include:
An interviewer can, however, ask about a personal characteristic if it could hinder your ability to fulfill the job's requirements. Some examples might be:
References
A previous employer is free to provide any non-confidential information about a previous employee, as long as it's true and isn't provided to maliciously harm the employee. An employer, who provides false information that disparages the employee, may be liable for defamation. In order to avoid potential liability, many employers often refuse to comment on a past employee's job performance and confirm only dates of hire and separation, plus wage or salary information.
At Will
In the majority of states, employees not working under an employment contract are deemed to be "at will." At-will employees may be terminated for any reason, so long as it's not illegal. There are numerous illegal reasons for termination. Typically such reasons fall into one of two large categories: illegal discrimination or illegal termination in violation of a public policy. Generally, employees who work under an employment contract can only be terminated for reasons specified in the contract.
In Arizona, the employment relationship may be terminated by either the employee or the employer unless both the employee and the employer have signed a written contract to the contrary. Both the employee and the employer must sign the written contract, or the written contract must be set forth in the employment handbook, manual or any similar document that is distributed to the employee. Generally, employees who work under an employment contract can only be terminated for reasons specified in the contract.
Employee Handbooks
While an employer is not required by law to have an employee handbook, in most cases, it is recommended. An employee handbook provides a centralized, complete and certain record of the employer's policies and procedures. In Arizona, employers may not change employee handbooks or other personnel policies, under certain circumstances, unless the employees accepted the proposed changes and were compensated for the policy modification. An employee handbook also provides more convenient access by employees and managers.
At a minimum, an employee handbook should include:
In Arizona, handbook disclaimers are required to avoid claims under an employer's handbook. In the absence of good disclaimers, certain employment policies or assurances may not be modified without giving employees something of value for their consent to the change. Employers may add, alter and rescind employment policies by providing notice and value to employees for the changes.
The laws regarding an employer's duties and responsibilities arising under an employee handbook are complex, and a licensed attorney should be contacted to review individual circumstances.
Workplace Safety
Federal and state laws require that most employers furnish a place of employment that is free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees. In most instances, an employee may anonymously complain about an unsafe work environment and be protected against employer reprisals.
The Arizona Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1972 (Act), provides safety and health protection for employees in Arizona. The Act requires each employer to furnish his employees with a place of employment free from recognized hazards that might cause serious injury or death.
Workplace Injury
Workers' compensation laws are designed to compensate employees who have been injured or killed in work related accidents according to a fixed monetary scheme, without having to resort to litigation. Dependents of a fatally injured employee may also be entitled to benefits. Employers may be protected by limits placed on the amount of an employee's recovery.
Workers' compensation is a "no fault" system in which injured workers receive medical and compensation benefits no matter who causes the job-related accident. If an illness or injury is job-related, the injured worker receives medical benefits and may receive temporary compensation. In some cases, an injured worker may also receive permanent compensation benefits and job retraining.
There are two kinds of permanent impairments, scheduled and unscheduled. Both types are paid on a monthly basis. A scheduled injury is to a specific body part and the Arizona Workers' Compensation Law has a schedule that indicates the amounts to be paid for these impairments. An unscheduled injury is the result of a general impairment, a combination of impairments to different body parts injured in one incident or a history of other permanent impairments.
Sexual Harassment
An employer may be liable to an employee for instances of "sexual harassment," which can include unwelcome sexual advances, conduct or other physical or verbal acts of a sexual nature, which occur in the workplace. The following conduct is generally considered sexual harassment:
Because the laws determining what conduct, or pattern of conduct, constitutes actionable sexual harassment are complex, a licensed attorney should be contacted to review individual circumstances.
Discrimination and Wrongful Termination
Employers are not allowed to terminate or discriminate against employees for the following reasons:
It's illegal for an employer to consider these characteristics with regard to:
And it's illegal for an employer to terminate an employee:
Family and Medical Leave
The Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) provides 12 weeks of unpaid leave to qualifying employees who need time off from work to care for their own or an immediate family member's serious health condition. This allows for continued medical benefits and restoration of their original position upon return. An employee is eligible when they:
An injury or illness qualifies as a "serious health condition" if it either requires an overnight stay in a medical facility or constitutes "continuing treatment" by a health-care provider. Continuing treatment requires either the employee's incapacity for more than three calendar days and at least two subsequent treatments, or treatment by a health-care provider that results in continuing supervised treatment.
Unemployment Benefits
Unemployment benefits are based on combinations of federal and state statutes. Unemployment compensation programs are administered by the state and normally provide monetary compensation to workers who have been terminated without cause, through no fault of their own. Employees who voluntarily terminate their employment for "good cause" may also be entitled to benefits.
Eligibility for unemployment insurance is based on insured wages paid to an employee during a one-year period called the base period. In most instances the base period will be the first four of the last five completed calendar quarters prior to the date the employee first applied for unemployment insurance. Benefits per week range from $60 to a maximum of $240 calculated from the highest quarter base period earnings.
COBRA
Under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA), which is a federal law, employees may be allowed to continue their health insurance benefits, at the employee's expense, for up to 18 months after either voluntary or involuntary termination, if the employer has 20 or more employees.
To qualify for COBRA continuation coverage, an employee must have a qualifying event that causes the employee to lose group health coverage. The following are qualifying events:
- The Industrial Commission of Arizona
- The Arizona Department of Economic Security
- Employment Law for Employees message boards for more help
fraud (as by the use of false or forged documents, false claims, or perjured testimony) that deceives the trier of fact and results in a judgment in favor of the party perpetrating the fraud
More Legal News